Donald Trump won the Iowa caucuses yesterday, the first step in his bid to reclaim the Republican nomination for the third consecutive presidential election. Read our recap.
How Trump Sidestepped the Tradition of Iowa Pandering
Presidential candidates often enmesh themselves in the state’s politics to woo voters, but the nature of this race means much less focus on local issues.

Donald J. Trump has run his campaign in Iowa in the style of an incumbent, focusing less on local issues in favor of big, national topics.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

- Former President Donald Trump in Clive, Iowa, on Monday. Doug Mills/The New York Times
- The race for second place in Iowa
Donald Trump won the Iowa caucuses yesterday, the first step in his bid to reclaim the Republican nomination for the third consecutive presidential election. Read our recap.
The victory, called by The Associated Press only 31 minutes after the caucuses had begun, accelerated his momentum toward a potential rematch in November with President Biden that could play out on both the campaign trail and in the courtroom.
Ron DeSantis, who had predicted victory in Iowa, came in a distant second. Nikki Haley finished third, appealing particularly to moderate, suburban and college-educated voters. The result was a setback for both Republicans, who had spent as much time and money battling each other in Iowa as battling the front-runner.
Quotable: In remarks, Trump said he wanted to “congratulate Nikki and Ron for having a good time together.”
Other news: Vivek Ramaswamy, the 38-year-old entrepreneur and political newcomer, dropped out of the race after a disappointing fourth-place finish.
- How Trump Sidestepped the Tradition of Iowa Pandering
Presidential candidates often enmesh themselves in the state’s politics to woo voters, but the nature of this race means much less focus on local issues.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/15/us/politics/iowa-caucus-state-politics.html?

Donald J. Trump has run his campaign in Iowa in the style of an incumbent, focusing less on local issues in favor of big, national topics.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
How Trump Sidestepped the Tradition of Iowa Pandering
Presidential candidates often enmesh themselves in the state’s politics to woo voters, but the nature of this race means much less focus on local issues.


By Anjali Huynh and Kellen Browning
Reporting from Des Moines
Campaigning in Iowa in the months leading up to the caucuses has traditionally involved candidates’ embracing local customs, visiting familiar locations and championing policies aimed at helping the state’s farm-driven economy.
But this year, the Republicans seeking their party’s presidential nomination have largely avoided over-the-top pandering to local priorities — and any such attempts appear not to be as effective as in the past.
That’s largely because former President Donald J. Trump, who has run in the style of an incumbent, has dominated the state while barely setting foot in it. Though he refers to Iowa farmers in his speeches and talks about how he has poured money into the state, Mr. Trump has eschewed the classic retail politicking that is a mainstay of the caucuses in favor of larger rallies while focusing his message more on national issues.
In doing so, Mr. Trump is suggesting that it is perhaps not as necessary to show so much deference to local priorities to score a victory in Iowa — at least, for a former president with a huge following.
Mr. Trump has held a large polling lead over his rivals in Iowa.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
“Most of the talk is about border security and the economy and inflation, national issues rather than Iowa-centric,” said Brent Siegrist, a state representative in Council Bluffs. If Mr. Trump was “not in the field, maybe some other issues would have risen to a more prominent role,” he suggested.
Jeff Kaufmann, the chairman of Iowa’s Republican Party, said he was “surprised” that the state of the U.S. border with Mexico, rather than a more local issue, had “vaulted to the forefront” of issues for many voters.
The other candidates have still sought to make Iowa-specific pitches typical of a traditional race. But with Mr. Trump maintaining a nearly 30-point lead over his nearest rival — Nikki Haley, the former governor of South Carolina — in the final Des Moines Register poll before the caucuses, their pitches do not always seem to land. Local issues have instead served more as a differentiator among the candidates competing for second place, rather than part of a winning strategy.
Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who has visited all of the state’s 99 counties and was pinning his hopes on a strong showing in the caucuses, has leaned into proposals aimed at resonating with agricultural communities, such as calling to remove a “death tax” on family farms.
Mr. DeSantis and Ms. Haley briefly sniped at each other over ethanol and agricultural issues during the most recent CNN debate. On Thursday, Ms. Haley took aim at Mr. DeSantis at a biofuels summit for previously supporting legislation to repeal the Renewable Fuels Standard, a popular policy that requires ethanol to be blended into gasoline.

Vivek Ramaswamy has seized on one local issue, planned carbon dioxide pipelines.Credit...Hilary Swift for The New York Times
And Vivek Ramaswamy, the wealthy entrepreneur, has harshly criticized his rivals, including Mr. Trump, by name for not opposing carbon dioxide pipelines that would seize some Iowans’ land via eminent domain.
Yet such sparring seemed almost quaint at a time when Mr. Trump and his legal travails continue to suck up most of the attention.
Monte Shaw, the executive director of the Renewable Fuels Association, said that the lower-polling candidates had “inevitably ended up talking about Iowa issues” by way of engaging with voters at town halls or participating in debates. But, he said, Mr. Trump’s larger rallies, with less voter interaction, had “allowed him to stick to broader issues.”
“It’s not really a typical caucus because you do have a former president running,” Mr. Shaw said. “He does have the ability to come in and draw big crowds,” he said, adding that “that is not your typical Iowa caucus style.”
Still, as Mr. Trump has sought to shore up support in the state, he, too, has made last-minute local pitches. In a video posted by Mr. Trump’s super PAC one day before the caucuses, Mr. Trump said he would “endorse ethanol” because “ethanol endorsed me”— though he presented no specifics about what that would entail in terms of policy.
The heightened attention on national priorities may not make much of a difference to Iowa in the long term. After all, past candidates have, at times, made promises that they seem to forget when the primary calendar moves onward. During former President Barack Obama’s first term, for example, he faced criticism from farming organizations for not fulfilling an Iowa campaign promise to close a loophole that benefited “mega-farms.”
Iowans say the focused attention has largely benefited their state over the years. They point to examples like the appointment of Tom Vilsack, the former governor of Iowa, as agriculture secretary under the Obama and Biden administrations as proof that hosting presidential candidates pays off.
Iowa has influenced policy by forcing candidates to study up on the Farm Bill, a legislative package that oversees agricultural and food programs nationwide. And Terry Branstad, the former governor of Iowa, noted that former President George W. Bush — the last Republican candidate to both win the Iowa caucuses and become the eventual party nominee — was “instrumental” in enacting the Renewable Fuel Standard.
“The use of ethanol under his leadership went way up, even though he’s from the oil state of Texas,” Mr. Branstad said. “That was something Iowans appreciated.”
Mr. Trump often boasts that he gave farmers $28 billion in bailouts to offset any repercussions from trade wars. But his focus on specific issues has been lacking.
But the state’s first-in-the-nation status — only for Republicans this cycle — remains important to lesser-known candidates trying to jump-start their campaigns. David Peterson, a political science professor at Iowa State University, suggested that years before presidential hopefuls join the field, they might consider how they would address agricultural policy and issues that affect rural Americans.
“If you’re a senator from a state that doesn’t have any agriculture, that doesn’t grow any corn, you’ve still got to think about ethanol subsidies, and, ‘Will that hurt me in Iowa?’” Mr. Peterson said. “It’s a cost-less thing to support because your constituents won’t care, but it could potentially be a costly thing to oppose if you end up running for president.”

Mr. Trump has eschewed the classic retail politicking that is a mainstay of the caucuses in favor of larger rallies and focusing his message more on national issues.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
With that in mind, the 2024 candidates have made varying degrees of such promises. Mr. DeSantis has vowed to move the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to Iowa. Ms. Haley has made general promises to take on China to “free America’s farmers and ranchers.” And Mr. Ramaswamy has suggested tying the U.S. dollar to agricultural commodities.
This week, Mr. DeSantis, Ms. Haley and former Gov. Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas, a long-shot candidate, appeared at a forum for the Iowa Renewable Fuels Summit to woo farmers, duly voicing their support for all eight parts of a Biofuels Vision plan, including promises to promote renewable fuels and oppose electric vehicle mandates.
However, Mr. Trump, who maintains a commanding lead over his rivals and remains a favorite among Iowa farmers, had not publicly taken a stance on more than half of them.
NEW
More to Discover
More in Politics

US
Key Trump Lawyer Withdraws as Manhattan Criminal Trial Nears
Try Something Different
Desiree Rios for The New York Times
US
In Frigid Texas, Will the Power Grid Be Able to Keep the Heat On?
Irving Browning/The New York Historical Society, via Getty Images
BOOKS
Could LSD Have Achieved World Peace? Ask Margaret Mead.
Gabriel Bouys/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
STYLE
Gucci’s Reboot Brings Back Old-School Cool
Jason Henry for The New York Times
BUSINESS
D.E.I. Goes Quiet
Editors Picks

SCIENCE
The Crochet Coral Reef Keeps Spawning, HyperbolicallyFor more stories, return to home.
Anjali Huynh, a member of the 2023-24 Times Fellowship class based in New York, covers national politics, the 2024 presidential campaign and other elections. More about Anjali Huynh
Kellen Browning writes about technology, the gig economy and the video game industry. He has been reporting for The Times since 2020.
More about Kellen Browning
Election 2024
- 5 takeaways from Trump’s runaway victory in the Iowa caucuses.
- The mood at the DeSantis watch party was anger and disbelief — over how fast the call was made.
- Trump invested in a muscular turnout operation, and it paid off.
- Vivek Ramaswamy, a wealthy political novice who aligned with Trump, dropped out of the race.
- News outlets declared Trump the winner even as Iowans were still caucusing.
Our Coverage of the 2024 Presidential Election
News and Analysis
Read More
Follow for live updates on the Iowa caucuses.
As Trump Continues to Insult E. Jean Carroll, 2nd Defamation Trial Opens
The writer has already won $5 million for his sexual abuse and his subsequent denials. But the former president still claims he does not know who she is.

E. Jean Carroll is seeking $10 million for statements Donald J. Trump made in 2019.Credit...Kirsten Luce for The New York Times



By Benjamin Weiser, Maggie Haberman and Maria Cramer
Jan. 15, 2024
A Manhattan jury will be asked a narrow question this week: How much money must former President Donald J. Trump pay the writer E. Jean Carroll for defaming her after she accused him of raping her?
Ms. Carroll’s chance encounter decades ago at the Bergdorf Goodman department store, in which she said Mr. Trump shoved her against a dressing room wall, pulled down her tights and forced himself on her, was already the focus of a trial last year. A jury in May awarded Ms. Carroll just over $2 million for the assault and nearly $3 million for defamation over Mr. Trump’s remark in October 2022 calling her claim “a complete con job.”
The trial starting Tuesday focuses on separate statements by Mr. Trump in June 2019, directly after Ms. Carroll disclosed her allegation in New York magazine. At the time, Mr. Trump called her claim “totally false,” saying that he had never met Ms. Carroll, a former Elle magazine advice columnist, and that she invented a story to sell a book.
Now, Mr. Trump says he wants to attend and testify at Ms. Carroll’s trial, something he didn’t do in the earlier case. That’s sparked a bitter dispute between lawyers for Ms. Carroll, 80, and Mr. Trump, 77, over what the former president could say if he took the stand, and whether he would stray beyond strict boundaries the judge has set
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan, has ruled that given the jury’s findings in the first trial, Mr. Trump cannot now contest Ms. Carroll’s version of events — as he frequently does in public statements.
“Mr. Trump is precluded from offering any testimony, evidence or argument suggesting or implying that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, that she fabricated her account of the assault or that she had any motive to do so,” Judge Kaplan wrote in an opinion on Jan. 9.
The judge had also previously ruled that Ms. Carroll does not need to prove again that Mr. Trump’s comments in 2019 were defamatory, finding they were substantially the same as those that prompted last year’s award.
“This trial will not be a ‘do over’ of the previous trial,” Judge Kaplan wrote on Jan. 9.
Ms. Carroll is seeking $10 million in damages for harm to her reputation, plus unspecified punitive damages, which are intended to deter misconduct.

Roberta A. Kaplan, left, wrote to the judge, saying that Mr. Trump’s “recent statements and behavior strongly suggest that he will seek to sow chaos.”Credit...Anna Watts for The New York Times
Still, Mr. Trump continues to attack her relentlessly, repeating that he had never met Ms. Carroll and denying that he assaulted her. Minutes after the verdict last year, he began to issue a stream of blistering posts on his Truth Social website, and later he went on CNN, where he called Ms. Carroll a “wack job” and said the trial was “a rigged deal.”
In recent weeks, he has escalated those attacks. On a single day at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida estate, he issued a rapid stream of more than 40 derisive Truth Social posts, stunning some advisers with the fusillade. On Jan. 6, while campaigning in Iowa, he said again that Ms. Carroll had faked her story.
Then on Thursday, when Mr. Trump was allowed to speak in court during New York’s civil fraud trial against him, he assailed a judge to his face. Afterward, Mr. Trump announced he would attend Ms. Carroll’s trial, “and I’m going to explain I don’t know who the hell she is.”
On Friday, Ms. Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta A. Kaplan, wrote to Judge Kaplan in federal court, saying that if Mr. Trump appeared at the trial as a witness or otherwise, “his recent statements and behavior strongly suggest that he will seek to sow chaos.”
“There are any number of reasons why Mr. Trump might perceive a personal or political benefit from intentionally turning this trial into a circus,” Ms. Kaplan said. (She is not related to Judge Kaplan.)
Ms. Kaplan asked that the judge, a veteran of nearly three decades on the bench, require Mr. Trump to state under oath that he understands what testimony is off-limits, like claiming he did not rape or know Ms. Carroll or questioning her motives.
Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, responded Sunday in a letter asking the judge to deny Ms. Kaplan’s request, saying it “proposed unprecedented hurdles.”
She said Mr. Trump was “well aware” of the court’s rulings “and the strict confines placed on his testimony.”
“We presume that this is not a kangaroo court of a third-world country,” Ms. Habba added, “where a party to a lawsuit is involuntarily made to say what a court and an opposing party wants them to say.”

Alina Habba, one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers, said her client well understands the judge’s rules. Credit...Jefferson Siegel for The New York Times
Meanwhile, Mr. Trump’s attacks on Ms. Carroll have not ended. On Friday, Judge Kaplan denied Mr. Trump’s request to delay the trial for one week to allow him to travel to Florida for the funeral of Melania Trump’s mother.
Mr. Trump went on Truth Social, calling Judge Kaplan a “crazed, Trump hating Judge” who had presided over an “Election Interference Witch Hunt, disguised as a trial, of a woman I have never met before.”
”Can anyone imagine a husband not going to his wife’s mother’s funeral over a MADE UP STORY,” Mr. Trump blared.
Ms. Kaplan and Ms. Habba have declined to comment about the case in recent days. Legal experts, though, have been puzzling over Mr. Trump’s approach.
Rebecca Roiphe, a New York Law School professor who studies the legal profession, said, “Whenever I can’t figure out a Trump legal strategy, I usually think it’s not a legal strategy but in fact a public relations strategy.”
Mr. Trump probably assumes he will lose, she said. “He just wants to claim that this is a political hit job, and so he’s giving himself the material with which to do that.”
As for Ms. Carroll, a substantial punitive damages award could be the most effective way to stop Mr. Trump’s attacks, said Chris Mattei, a lawyer who in 2022 helped the families of eight people killed in the 2012 mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., win $1.4 billion from Alex Jones, the Infowars conspiracy broadcaster.
“You would expect Ms. Carroll to present all the evidence available to her,” Mr. Mattei said, “to show that Donald Trump is recalcitrant and determined to continue to harm her.”
Ben Chew, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who represented the actor Johnny Depp in a defamation case against his ex-wife, said money is Mr. Trump’s vulnerable spot.
“It’s really the only avenue through which the court or the jury can put an end to this,” he said.
Mr. Trump has long been furious about Ms. Carroll’s allegations, and in private, he has repeatedly railed against her.
In the trial last spring, Ms. Carroll testified that the attack at Bergdorf’s came after she bumped into Mr. Trump one evening, and he asked her to help him buy a present for a female friend.
They ended up in the lingerie section, where he motioned her to a dressing room, shut the door and began assaulting her. Using his weight to pin her, he pulled down her tights and forced his fingers and then, she said, his penis into her vagina. The jury did not, however, find he had raped her.
Judge Kaplan has ruled that because the jury found that Mr. Trump had used his fingers to assault her, her rape claim was “substantially true under common modern parlance.”
Kellen Browning contributed reporting from Newton, Iowa, and Susan C. Beachy contributed research.
NEW
More to Discover
More in New York

NYREGION
Investigators Find Hospital Error Caused Mother’s Death in Brooklyn
Try Something Different
Jefferson Siegel for The New York Times
US
Key Trump Lawyer Withdraws as Manhattan Criminal Trial Nears
Joyce Lee for The New York Times
WELL
How Much Water Do I Need to Drink?
Sarah Rice for The New York Times
ARTS
The Man in the Sequined Tuxedo Who Built a Dance
Mohammed Hajjar/Associated Press
OPINION
The Things We Disagree on About
Editors Picks

SCIENCE
The Crochet Coral Reef Keeps Spawning, HyperbolicallyFor more stories, return to home.
Benjamin Weiser is a reporter covering the Manhattan federal courts. He has long covered criminal justice, both as a beat and investigative reporter. Before joining The Times in 1997, he worked at The Washington Post. More about Benjamin Weiser
Maggie Haberman is a senior political correspondent reporting on the 2024 presidential campaign, down ballot races across the country and the investigations into former President Donald J. Trump. More about Maggie Haberman
Maria Cramer is a Times reporter covering the New York Police Department and crime in the city and surrounding areas. More about Maria Cramer
What to Know About E. Jean Carroll’s Accusations
Card 1 of 5
Two lawsuits. E. Jean Carroll, a writer who says Donald Trump raped her in the mid 1990s, filed two separate lawsuits against the former president. Here’s what to know:
How Trump, DeSantis and Haley’s Teams Are Thinking About Turnout in Iowa
Republican campaigns are battling cold, complacency and voter discontent as they push voters to caucus on Monday.

Campaigns are struggling to predict how many voters may show up to caucus during dangerous winter weather in Iowa.Credit...Hilary Swift for The New York Times 

By Jonathan Swan and Charles Homans
Jonathan Swan reported from Des Moines and Urbandale, Iowa. Charles Homans reported from Waukee and Waterloo, Iowa.
Jan. 15, 2024
Nikki Haley’s team predicts Iowans will brave brutal weather to caucus for her. Aides to Ron DeSantis say the subzero temperatures give their candidate an edge because he has the biggest team knocking on doors. And the Trump team says they don’t worry about the cold — former President Donald J. Trump’s supporters will “walk through glass” to caucus for him.
The truth: No one really knows what to expect on Monday night when Iowans become the first to weigh in on the 2024 presidential election. An already unpredictable and quirky process is even more so this year, thanks to dangerously cold weather and an unusually uncompetitive contest.
Until recently, both the Trump and DeSantis teams had been privately preparing for an enormous turnout of more than 200,000 caucusgoers, a figure that would eclipse the party’s previous record of 187,000 in 2016. But as the winter storm blew in last week, nobody from any of the leading campaigns wanted to attach their names to a firm prediction.
The National Weather Service forecast subzero temperatures in Des Moines, with wind chills dropping to as low as minus 30 degrees on Monday.
This year’s caucuses are unusual for many reasons beyond the weather. A contest known for elevating long shots has been dominated by the former president for months. What suspense is building is not about the winner, but about the margin of victory and who claims second place.
That has given the affair a subdued, sedated feel. Interviews with voters across the state reveal many are unhappy with their choices, and feel that they’re going through the motions in a simulation of a contest.
Brian Bean, an insurance company owner in Waukee who caucused for Mr. Trump in 2016, is not caucusing, he said, citing concerns about some of Mr. Trump’s recent speeches and a field of other candidates that had left him unimpressed. While he expects to vote for Mr. Trump in November if he is the Republican nominee, “What bothers me about him is he’s not denying that he won’t be vindictive if he’s elected,” Mr. Bean said. “And I’ve got a problem with that.”
A volunteer assembling Trump campaign yard signs in Urbandale, Iowa.Credit...Jon Cherry for The New York Times
Some of the discontent is distinctly Iowan, said Bob Beatty, a political science professor at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas, and an expert on the Iowa caucuses. Voters in the state delight in being courted by candidates and wielding their perceived influence. (In reality, Iowa Republicans have a poor record of picking the recent nominees.)
This year, Iowans have been effectively stripped of their role by Mr. Trump’s apparent advantage — a key poll published Saturday showed him winning 48 percent — and lack of interest in the storied traditions of campaigning in Iowa. Mr. Trump’s campaign in the state has been limited to large rallies and he didn’t participate in any of the primary debates.
“He’s not shaking hands, and he’s not taking questions,” Mr. Beatty said. “Trump is campaigning as an incumbent, and it’s half working. And if you get half, that’s it.”
Encapsulating the local malaise — albeit from the anti-Trump perspective — the Raygun clothing store in Des Moines is selling T-shirts with the slogan: “Election 2024: You’d think battling a fascist takeover of America would spark more interest from people.”
David Kochel, a longtime Iowa political strategist, predicted about 150,000 Iowans would show up on Monday, a figure in line with historical norms, but still just about 25 percent of the registered Republicans in the state. He cited Mr. Trump’s lead and the weather as the biggest factors.
“Iowans can go out when it’s 15, 20 degrees, no problem. They do it all the time, all winter long,” Mr. Kochel said. But when it’s “10 below, 20 below — that can get dangerous for people. I mean, cars don’t start, elderly people, frostbite.”
Voters cannot participate on their own schedule. To caucus, voters must show up at their local caucus site at 7 p.m., listen to speeches from candidates’ supporters and write down their preference. The process can be quick — or not.

The National Weather Service is projecting wind chills as low as minus 30 degrees in parts of Iowa on Monday.Credit...Hilary Swift for The New York Times
Some would-be caucusgoers, looking at the forecast, were having second thoughts.
Anthony O’Malley, 61, a retired Army veteran and a Republican-leaning independent in Waterloo, said he was considering registering as a Republican in order to caucus on Monday, and was deciding between Mr. Trump and Ms. Haley. But the combination of a recent surgery and the weather had changed his mind.
“It ain’t worth it,” he said.
Mr. Kochel, who is not aligned with a campaign, said he believed lower turnout would benefit Mr. Trump’s rivals. Polls show Mr. Trump is more popular with people who are considering caucusing for the first time this year, a group that might be easily deterred by the weather.
That’s a view shared by the DeSantis operation, which has spent weeks boasting of its get-out-the-vote machine. The well-funded super PAC backing the governor, Never Back Down, has spent tens of millions of dollars on voter outreach in the early states — outspending any of Mr. DeSantis’s rivals. Over the past seven months the DeSantis super PAC has identified every potential DeSantis voter in Iowa and visited their homes multiple times. It has collected reams of data on these voters, studied what would be required to get them to caucus for Mr. DeSantis — whether they need a ride or some extra encouragement from a neighbor. It says it has enlisted 1,600 precinct captains ready to organize caucusgoers on Monday.
An adviser for the Trump campaign, Chris LaCivita, scoffed at the idea that bad weather was good for Mr. DeSantis.
“It’s laughable that weather would have a greater impact on first-time caucusgoers,” Mr. LaCivita said, claiming the campaign’s voters had an extraordinary level of commitment. “When Trump says most people will walk through glass to vote for him, he’s not joking.”
Asked whether the Trump campaign was doing anything to ensure their voters showed up to caucus in the subzero temperatures, Mr. LaCivita said that months ago they began recruiting drivers with four-wheel-drive vehicles to give neighbors rides to caucus sites.
Mr. Trump’s campaign has been outspent by Mr. DeSantis. But, unlike in 2016, when Mr. Trump lost Iowa to Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, the former president has built a professional campaign operation.
The campaign says it has around 2,000 caucus captains — identifiable by their signature gold and white caps, which have already become a coveted collector’s item in Iowa political circles. Many of these volunteers have been given formal training and each has been tasked with bringing 10 Iowans to caucus for Mr. Trump.

Voters listened to Ron DeSantis speak in Council Bluffs, Iowa, on Saturday.Credit...Jordan Gale for The New York Times
Mr. Trump also benefits from intensely loyal fans, some of whom have driven many miles to help him out, without having any contact with the campaign.
Edward Micheals, a 66-year-old truck driver, said he drove from his home in Dallas, Texas, to volunteer. “We don’t want to take any chances,” he said in an interview at the Machine Shed restaurant in Urbandale on Thursday, where the former president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., rallied supporters.
Amid all of this uncertainty, the biggest wild card is Ms. Haley.
Until late November, she had almost no campaign staff on the ground in Iowa. But then the political network founded by the billionaire industrialist brothers Charles and David Koch endorsed her and handed over their organizational muscle and financial heft. The group, Americans for Prosperity Action, has been knocking doors across Iowa for Ms. Haley, trying to reassemble the coalition of wealthier, college-educated Republicans that brought Senator Marco Rubio of Florida close to victory in a fast finish in the 2016 Iowa caucuses.
The weather may play to her advantage with that group. Those voters are concentrated in urban areas, where roads have been cleared and it will be easier for them to get to a caucus site. It’s unclear which factor will matter more in her fight with Mr. DeSantis for second place.
“If you put a gun in my head right now, I would probably rather be Nikki Haley because she has had the better trajectory than DeSantis over time,” said Mr. Kochel, the political strategist, referring to the battle for second place. “But boy, I wouldn’t bet a mortgage payment on it right now.”
Reporting was contributed by Jazmine Ulloa, Reid J. Epstein, Kellen Browning and Lisa Lerer.
Jonathan Swan is a political reporter covering the 2024 presidential election and Donald Trump’s campaign. More about Jonathan Swan
Charles Homans is a reporter for The Times and The Times Magazine, covering national politics. More about Charles Homans
Jan. 16, 2024,
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/15/us/politics/iowa-caucus-donald-trump-voter-turnout.html?
Get in touch with us today and let us help you take your business to the next level.
Learn about our company history, our mission and vision, and the team behind USA Weekly News.
Email: INLWorldNews@inltv.co.uk
93 Cambridge Street
Mitchell
Queensland
Australia
4465